|
|
Journal
Scan |
||||||||||||
|
Updated:26/12/2005
|
Koshimune M et al. Conventional wisdom has been that one needs a locking plate to provide enough stability in dorsally displaced distal radial fracture fixation through the volar approach in the elderly. It is felt that the non-locking plate would not be able to withstand the higher load and bone purchase would also not be adequate. Authors set out to test this hypothesis in this study. 106 patients (range 65-89) were entered . The two groups were reasonably similar. But there is some concern on methodology. A criterion for entry into study was failure of closed reduction. I am not sure why obviously unstable fractures had to be manipulated into cast. There is no information how quality control was ensured of manipulation treatment. It is not clear if there was adequate concealment or whether the clinical assessors were blinded. Minimum follow up was six months. Outcome measures were radiological as well as functional (Gartland and Werley). There was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. It is interesting that none of the patients received bone graft, and yet radiological criteria seem to have been well maintained. This leads one to suspect that bone quality was rather better than the average UK DGH distal radial fracture. A good attempt but results may not be applicable to UK settings.
Laohapoonrungsee A et al. Many have investigated the optimal screw placement and screw cutout risks in DHS fixation. However, one does not see investigations of side plate efficacy and optimisation. Authors from Thailand treated standard 112 intertrochanteric fractures with 2 hole DHS plate. This included both A 1 and A 2 type fractures. 83 patients were followed up till bony union. Only two plates failed. Both treated later with longer side plates. Although plate failure is a reasonable outcome measure it is difficult to work out the length of follow up. A significant number of original patients were lost to follow up and this attritional bias may have a bearing on the results. One presumes that you need to hold eight cortices below the fracture in femoral fixation for satisfactory bony purchase. The attraction of this study is a smaller incision and soft tissue damage. A randomised study between two and four hole side plates to investigate this issue seriously may be worthwhile.
Victor J, Banks S, Bellemans S. Kinematics of PCL retaining and substituting total knee
arthroplasty. JBJS B 2005; 87-B:645-655.
Senavongse W, Amis AA. JBJS B, 2005; 87(4):577-82.
.
Saleh K et al. Symposium
on operative treatment of patellofemoral OA. JBJS 87-A 3: 659-70.
Hortobagyi T et al. Altered
hamstring-quadriceps muscle balance in patients with knee osteoartiritis.
Clin Biomech 20:97-104. This
article would be of interest to surgeons interested in physiotherapy as
a mode of management in osteoarthritis. Various studies have shown that
physiotherapy is a useful tool for treating early osteoarthritis of the
knees. Physio mainly concentrates on quads build up exercise. In a non-randomised
case control study, the authors show that quads-hamstrings muscle
recruitment is altered in knee OA. Quad-hamstrings activity was tested
with surface electrodes during level walking and stair climbing and
descent. Hamstring muscle coactivity was found to be greater during ADL
in OA subjects. That patients with knee OA have weak quads is well
documented. However, studies in the past have not addressed the question
of quads/hamstrings balance in OA. More importantly, the study also
found that altered muscle response was more widespread than
quads/hamstrings coupling and suggests that therapeutic interventions
should not limited to strengthening quadriceps muscles but also target
other lower limb muscles.
Rowe SM et al. Why does
outer joint motion predominate in bipolar hip prosthesis? Acta
Orthop Scand 2004; 75(6):701-7.
Rodeo SA et al. What’s new in orthopaedic research? JBJS A 86 A Sept 2004 pp. 2085-97. Authors
have described recent advances in orthopaedic research in specialty
update section in the recent issue of JBJS A. Cartilage
degradation and repair: Our
understanding of cartilage degradation and repair is still limited.
Recent studies have indicated that extracellular matrix proteins , when
fragmented, may have deleterious effect on chondrocyte metabolism. Many
of the pathways involved in this interaction are being identified. Using
drugs to manipulate fracture healing: It
appears that our experience of treating osteoporosis could lead to
increasing understanding of ways to use drugs to manipulate fracture
healing. Bisphosphonate is used to treat osteoporosis. It prevents bone
resorption by inhibiting osteoclasts. This mechanism also delays bone
remodelling. Conversely, use of parathyroid hormone enhances bone
formation and may help in treating disuse osteoporosis
following trauma. Use
of NSAID following trauma: There
is concern that NSAIDs can impair fracture healing by inhibiting
inflammation. Animal studies showed reversible impairment of fracture
healing when COX 2 inhibitors were used. It is recommended that their
short term use is safe in healthy patients but NSAIDs should be avoided
in patients with risk factors-diabetics, those on steroids, smokers etc. Alternate
implants: To
date implants used in orthopaedic practice are designed to transfer load
to host bone. New hydrogel implants are being developed which intend to
act as load sharing device. Hydrogel is hydrophilic polymer. Candidates
for use would be meniscus replacement, IV disc replacement etc. Animal
studies have shown promising results.
Tissue engineering: One of the challenges of tissue engineering is to manufacture a tissue scaffold that can withstand in-vivo mechanical load and also allow biologic integration. The authors discuss studies that have explored nanotechnology to build better scaffolds.
V. Pinskerova; P. Johal; S. Nakagawa; A. Sosna; A. Williams; W. Gedroyc; M.A.R. Freeman
Does the femur roll-back with flexion?
Volume
86-B Number 6 August 2004, 925-32.
The answer is, yes, but not as we know , or we like to think we know it does. In this multi-centre study, Pinserova et al sets out to challenge this axiom of orthopaedic biomechanics. We are interested in the kinematics of the normal knee. Because that is what we would like to replicate in the prosthetic knee.
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Rankin M. Meniscal Transplantation in Symptomatic Patients Less Than Fifty Years Old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86: 1392-1404. A prospective review from Cincinnati on the results of meniscal transplantation in symptomatic young patients. That menisci are important for shock absorption and load dissipation is now well known. Unfortunately, due to its poor vascularity very few menisci are amenable to repair. Partial or total menisectomy results in early OA. A successful transplantation would be a great boon for many of these patients. Noyes et al prospectively reviewed 40 allograft transplants in 38 knees. These were the result of sporting injuries.There was no control group. Patients with gross OA were excluded. Grafts were analysed pre and post transplantation by an independent observer with MRI . Most of the patients had single meniscal graft. Quite a few also had osteochondral graft and/or soft tissue procedures. The reported success rate is modest ( more than 50% had abnormal allograft signal, 76% returned to light sports), the follow up is short ( mean 40 months). Lateral meniscal graft is known to have better survival rate. They do not mention the side. It can be argued that improvement in knee score could be due to the other procedures. Authors agree that the study shows the results of short term symptomatic beneficial effects only. They also recommend early than late transplantation. This is on the presumption that early transplantation would have some chondroprotective effect. Biomechanically, this makes sense. Sadly, there are many unresolved issues with allograft. We do not know how meniscal allograft would respond to a different environment. Is there a long term chondroprotective effect ? Future long term studies can answer that question. For now immediate short term effects seem to be encouraging.
Muschler GF, Nakamoto C, Griffith LG. Engineering Principles of Clinical Cell-Based Tissue Engineering. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86: 1541-1558. A review article from USA on the principles of tissue engineering, including current position and future promises for the muskuloskeletal system. The public perception of tissue engineering is limited to ex-vivo growth of new tissue and viable transplant in-vivo. Although we have not reached that stage as yet, research and development in this speciality has witnessed great strides. We learn about stem cell cycle, their broad phenotypic potential, and present efforts to utilise them. We learn of present strategies to target stem cells and future promises. Technology has advanced to the stage where it is possible to harvest few stem cells and culture them to sufficient numbers to allow in vivo transplant. A major obstacle still is a viable scaffolding that would protect transplanted cells and allow them intended function. Optimum type of scaffolding remains unresolved. A major emphasis in future is likely to be on modulation of local cellular environment. This could be a possibility with the use of viral vectors.
Lin TW, Cardenas L, Soslowsky LJ. Biomechanics of tendon injury and repair. J Biomech. 2004 Jun;37(6):865-77. Type: review article Setting: University of Pennsylvania, USA Aims: To discuss tendon repair mechanisms, experimental animal models and current and future treatment modalities. Tendons serve important functions. They transmit large tensile forces between bone and muscle. They are also prone to injury. Commonly, they are injured at the musculo-tendinous or osteotendinous junction due to overuse or tensile overload. Healing is difficult due to poor vascularity and cellular paucity. We know that functional outcome after tendon injury depends on many factors. There are proponents of both intrinsic and extrinsic tendon healing. Intrinsic theory demands that tendon can heal on it's own from local blood supply without scarring. Extrinsic theory proposes local inflammation, scarring and external blood supply to be important for healing. The truth, probably, is somewhere in the middle. Natural history of tendon healing is with scar formation. This scar is biomechanically inferior to normal tissue. The gap has poor tensile strength and, if greater than 3 mm, does not improve over time. Repair strength of tendon is directly proportional to the no. of strands crossing a repair site. Additional epitenon suture gives better strength over core suture alone. Animal studies with activity have shown generally positive effect of exercise on tendon. Disuse has resulted in adhesion and poor functional property. Both active and passive motion of flexor tendons post-injury resulted in improved tensile property. Finally, the paper discuses future treatment options. Biocomposite materials have been tested to serve as replacement tissue or to enhance healing. They have not been found to fulfill the biomechanical requirement of original in vivo function. Cytokines have also been proposed, but the delivery system is not still developed. A new approach is functional tissue engineering (FTE). It intends to identify in-vivo functional requirement to design safer and more effective composite. New developments in molecular biology are likely to make cell therapy a possibility. Mesenchymal stem cells are likely candidates for tendon healing therapy. They can be isolated from bone marrow. Delivery system is again a problem and to date, studies have not showed marked difference in outcome. If the delivery system can be resolved, gene therapy could also become viable. |
|
|||||||||||